Data for Accountability Project

Overview

Comprehensive data for monitoring the progress of the Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDGs) implementation is crucial to enable parliaments to perform their oversight and accountability role effectively and ensure no part of the country is left behind. The Data for Accountability Project (DAP), led by the African Centre for Parliamentary Affairs, in partnership with the Ghana Statistical Service (GSS), the International Network for Advancing Science and Policy (INASP) and On Think Tanks (OTT) Consulting, is the first project specifically aiming to strengthen the use of statistics in parliamentary oversight and representation in Ghana. DAP, which started in 2019 and currently in its second phase is supporting the Parliament to oversee the implementation of the SDGs in Ghana, by providing the evidence needed to monitor progress and advocate better for their constituencies. In addition to supporting Parliament’s oversight of SDG progress, the project aims to strengthen the capacity of parliamentary research officers to provide MPs with data and evidence that is most relevant to their work.

Interventions

Data for Accountability uses a range of approaches to strengthen the collaboration between data producers and parliament and support parliament to use data to oversee progress towards SDGs, including:

  • training and mentoring of MPs, parliamentary staff and GSS staff. 
  • supporting the development of constituency profiles i.e. constituency specific data that will enable MPs to better monitor the SDGs in their communities and represent constituents’ needs. 
  • Establishing an SDG desk within the Parliamentary Research department to support committees to track and report on SDGs
  • Organising data fairs to enable producers of research to showcase the availability of important data to parliament.
  • Sharing learning with the parliamentary, evidence informed policy making and statistical sectors etc.

Outcomes

The project has so far yielded some significant results:

  • MPs and staff are appreciating the value and contribution of data to decision making 
  • Capacity of MPs on the Poverty Reductions Strategy Committee to undertake key monitoring and oversight functions strengthened
  • Mechanisms to enable MPs access, interpret and use SDGs data have been developed    
  • Five Constituency profiles have been developed 
  • Interactions between MPs, data producers and citizens have fostered greater levels of engagement, promoting a greater appreciation on the part of MPs about the value of data, existing gaps, and the role of GSS and other data producers.
  • Greater awareness of the extent of the data gaps at the national and subnational/constituency levels
  • The project created the opportunity to bring Parliament and GSS together – therefore greater levels of appreciation for the value of data and GSS’ role
  • Trust between GSS and Parliament is improving – example of GSS sharing micro data with Research Officers from Parliament
  • Sharing learning with a wider audience through publications and webinars 

Partners

  • Parliament of Ghana
  • Ghana Statistical Service (GSS)
  • International Network for Advancing Science and Policy (INASP)
  • William and Flora Hewlett Foundation

Related Posts

News

Press Statement by the African Centre for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA) on the Upcoming Elections in Ghana

Accra, Ghana | 3rd December 2024 – The African Centre for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA) reaffirms its unwavering commitment to the principles of democracy and good governance as Ghana approaches a pivotal moment in its democratic journey—the upcoming elections. We take immense pride in the remarkable progress our nation has made in strengthening democratic institutions and processes. Elections […]

News

ILGRP Project Team In Kenya Trains CSOs and WRGs

The African Centre for Parliamentary Affairs (ACEPA)’s ILGRP project team in Kenya organised working sessions with civil society organizations and women rights groups (CSO/WRGs) on effective engagement regarding parliamentary gender responsive oversight. The practical sessions involved assessing gender gaps during post-legislative scrutiny and the impact of judicial outcomes on law-making; as well as exploring gender concerns that[…]